6. What other remarks might you have about the books? Questions? Observations? Reactions?
One question that I have for Mr. McCarthy is why does the man insist on heading south knowing that it is highly unlikely for them both to make it. He claims going south is the answer to his problems but it does not seem that way. Actually, by going south he putting his son as well as himself in more of harms way. Yet at the same time, yet if his family stayed put they would ll die. The man and his son never seem to get a break from this turmoil. For instance, when his wife decided that she was leaving him and the boy, she called him out. She said that by continuing on this path he was only putting themselves more at risk. Ever since she left them her foreshadowing was correct. Encounters with thugs, having a knife to his sons throat, having his son watch the man shoot someone. It could not be any more clearer that by heading South is the wrong thing to do in my mind because you are scaring the kid for life. But of course i guess the man plans on telling the boy again his famous quote; "you forget what you want to remember and you remember what you want to forget". So does the man expect the boy to cope easily with these tragic events being that he has never been exposed to these kind of things. It just does not make sense to me.
In my mind I believe that if he really wanted to head south, he could have done so already but some things are holding him back. The death of his wife and the burden of taking care of his child. The boy only seems to get in the way of things, complicate things and causes unneeded frustration towards the man. The man may not want to say that to the boy but deep down he knows it is true. Some things the boy does are simply just to agitate the man. Like when his father tells him to stay put and he begins to complain about how scared he is. I do not think the boy realizes sometimes that the man leaves for a reason; in an attempt to find materials to keep them alive. So he tries every way possible to keep his father with him. This is ok to a certain point especially in this world. Sure the boy is young and timid but there comes a time to show some courage and habe no fear. The boy just never seems to do this and the man feeds into it and starts to feel sorry for his son because he thinks he is not being a good father. Then he looses sight of the task at hand. Days and days wasted in my mind taking several breaks and having to feed the boy multiple times.
I feel that the boy should not be so much of a burden but more of safeguard relationship. At first, the only thing keeping the man sane were his day dreams but now he needs to rely on his son for support. He could learn a lot from him. The boys sense of security is made by his father. Together they should rely on each other much more in order to survive. I have not finished reading the book yet, but if you break them up, I am not sure if either one would survive.
Thursday, August 4, 2011
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Blog Archive
-
▼
2011
(456)
-
▼
August
(202)
- On the Road, Post 3, Question 2
- #4
- Question 7 (post 6)
- "Open Courses, Nearly Free"
- The Road Post 3 Question 6
- On the Road, Post 2, Question 1
- "Deciding to Die, Then Shown the Door"
- The Road, Post 2, Question 7
- On the Road, Post 1, Question 4
- “As Farmers’ Markets Go Mainstream, Some Fear a Glut”
- The Road, Post 1, Question 5
- Question 6 (post 5)
- Question 5 (post 4)
- the road
- On the Road- Question 4
- On the Road- Question 7
- On The Road- Question 1
- On the road post 1
- On The Road Post Three (Post Six)
- question 3 ( 3rd post "on the road" by kerouac
- question 6 (2nd post "on the road" by kerouac)
- question 4 ( 1st post "on the road" by jack kerouac )
- 3. In 1952 (when people still wrote letters to eac...
- On the Road (Question 3, Post 6)
- #3 Allen Ginsberg I agree with Allen. I don't und...
- The Road Post 3
- On The Road: Post 2
- The Road Post 2
- The Road Post 1
- <!--[if gte mso 9]> <![endif]--><!--[if gte...
- <!--[if gte mso 9]> <![endif]--><!--[if gte...
- On The Road 1
- On the Road -- The Catcher in the Rye
- On the Road -- What is the Road?
- On the Road -- Women
- On The Road:Post 3
- On The Road:Post 1
- On the Road (Post 3)
- On The Road (Question 1, Post 5)
- On The Road Post 2 (Post 5)
- On the Road- Post 3; Question 6
- The Road Post 3
- The Road Post 2
- Question 7. Post 6.
- Question 5. Post 5.
- Question 4. Post 4.
- The Road Post 1
- The Road (question 6, post 6)
- The Kids Are Not All Right
- Israel and Hamas Move to Restore Cease-Fire
- Woman= Sex Object On The Road, Post 1, Question 4....
- Hope! The Road, Post 3, Question 7 7. If every bo...
- Lost With the World... The Road, Post 2, Question ...
- All the King's Horses
- #1 On The Road
- 4. Consider both novels. What do you notice about ...
- McCarthy's women
- The Road (Question 7)
- The Road, Question 7
- What is your impression of Sal as a narrator? Reli...
- On The Road (Question 1)
- The Road (Question 4)
- On The Road (Question 7)
- Question 5: McCarthys style of writting
- McCarthy’s style of writing
- Can you tell Kerouac loved language?
- Question 6: Any other remarks and comments
- Question 4: treatment of women in both novels
- The Road (Post 3)
- 6. What other remarks might you have about the books?
- On The Road (post3,question6)
- 1. On the Road, while classified as fiction, is a ...
- 2. Can you tell Kerouac loved language? Reflect on...
- 4. Consider both novels. What do you notice about ...
- The Road - Post 3; Question 4
- Question #2
- Question #1
- Question #3
- The Road (Post 4, Question 4)
- On The Road: Post 2
- The Road: Post 3
- On The Road (Post 2)
- The Road: Post 2
- The Road: Post 1
- 7. If every book is an author's attempt to answer ...
- The Road, Post 2
- The Road (question 7, post 5)
- The Road (question 5, post 4)
- On The Road (Question 4)
- On the Road (Question 6, Post 2)
- Post 3 Question #4
- Question 4 Love or pathological lust? Part 1
- The Road, Post 1
- On The Road ( post 2, question 2)
- On The Road ( post 1, question 4)
- On the Road (Post 1, Question 7)
- The Road (Post 1, Question 5)
- The Road (Post 1, Question 5) 5. McCarthy's novel...
- The Road Q6 (Post 3)
- The Road Q5 (Post 2)
- The Road, Q4 (Post 1)
- Question 2 (Post 2)
- On The Road (Post 1)
- The Road (Post 3, Question 6)
- The Road (Post 2, Question 7)
- The Road (Post 1, Question 5)
- The Road Post 3
- 6. What other remarks might you have about the boo...
- Eric's OTR post that I deleted. oooops
- Question 1 (post 1)
- The Road- Post 2 Question #7
- The Road- Post 1 Question #6
- Question 2 (post 2)
- The Road - Post 2; Question 7
- One The Road - Post 2, Question 6
- The Road - Post 1, Question 5
- 5. McCarthy's novel is a stark contrast to Kerouac...
- 6. What other remarks might you have about the boo...
- 7. If every book is an author's attempt to answer ...
- The Road - Question 7
- The Road - Question 6
- The Road - Question 5
- The Road (post3,question4)
- Fight Harder, Voters Telling Congressmen
- Politicians and Protesters Assail British Police
- C.I.A. Is Disputed on Civilian Toll in Drone Strikes
- On the Road, Q4
- On the Road Q1
-
▼
August
(202)
4 comments:
Ok, to respond to your first question, it was very explicitly stated that they're moving South because the man knows that they won't survive the cold of another winter in the North. So, if they don't leave, they die.
It seems that you share the mentality of the mother, who argued that is would be better to die than suffer the hardships of the post-apocoliptic world. It thus becomes an interesting question: why doesn't the man kill the boy and himself?
Perhaps it's because the man cannot bring himself to kill the boy.
Maybe the man believes any life is better than death.
The only two options the man has are to either expose his son to the Road or kill him.
To respond to the rub of your second paragraph, it is said by the man that if the boy were not alive, he wouldn't want to live either. Thus, the boy is not an impediment to the man's survival, but rather the reason for it.
I would argue that the boy shows a ridiculous amount of resourcefulness and emotional balance, especially **SPOILERS** in the instance of seeing a dead baby roasting on a spit. That's something none of us can even begin to imagine. To ask a small child to "show some courage and have no fear" when encountering cannibals, witnessing rape, and being covered in a man's brains, is silly.
How far into the book were you when you posted this?
Great question, Henry.
I agree with Henry in that, the father and his son had to keep moving, or they would have died. This is repeated more than once throughout the book. There is not enough food for them to say in one place for the rest of their lives.
I also don't think you understand the age of the child. He can’t be more than eight or nine. Most parents don't let their children watch TV shows in which these things occur. So to actually experience them, would be terrifying for anyone.
I do agree with you, when you say that if they were split up they would probably die. A child cannot survive by himself, and the father would have killed himself a long time ago, had it not been for the need to let the son survive.
I don't understand why you said that if they wanted to move south they would have done so already. The father and his son are moving south, and they have been since the beginning of the story. Yes, sometimes that the boy does get scared, but it’s not for his own safety. He is afraid that his father is going to get hurt. The boy is not being self-centered rather he is reminding the father that the father is human, and he is on a mission to protect the child. To expect the child to show some courage in the face of murder and cannibals and death and blood and gore, is ridiculous. The boy is showing more courage then I believe I could. Have you read page 56? The child is held with a knife to his throat and he still does not cry out. He gets covered in the man’s blood and intestines and he still does not cry out. You expect him to go through the entire story without winning and crying, but that’s not human. Even the father cries when he is alone. Nothing that the boy does is wrong. He's a child, what do you expect?
wow thank you for clearing some of that up for me henry and isabella. I was a third of the way through the book but I have been readin some more and have a better understanding of the boy. Excuse me for not noticing this earlier in the book
Post a Comment